-
Call me old fashioned, but…
I’ve probably said this a million times but I don’t see the point of pole being “toned down” to appease the masses. I read some annoying article today regarding the whole “Pole in the Olympics”-controversy and I probably shouldn’t have because I knew it would probably aggravate me. Let me break it down:
1.) Heels – You don’t have to wear them, you don’t have to like them, but THEY ARE JUST SHOES. Seriously, wtf do people have against wearing shoes while poling? Why is this such an issue with some people?
“They remind us of strippers!”
Heaven forbid. We should get rid of the pole, then, somebody may have a flashback of a strip-club they visited in 1998 and find themselves unable to control their sexual urges.
2.) The word “gyrate” – This article used the phrase “gyrate around the pole” about four times. While by definition this word would be accurate, the context it’s used in is obviously for the purpose of misleading the reader. Here, please allow me to juggle and gyrate my breasts to demonstrate this phrase visually.
3.) Stricter clothing requirements – Have you ever watched figure skaters or gymnasts or…um…volleyball competitions? These are the most scantily clad professional female athletes I have ever seen and, really, I see no specific purpose for their attire to be that way except to keep them cool as they sweat bullets. Pole competitions often have ridiculously strict rules about choice of clothing (“gluteal crease and cleavage must not become visible at any time”, wtf?) and, truly, better skin contact is a huge part of executing moves safely with proper form. Yes, we all know those people who can dance fully clothed from head to toe and they’re still awesome. I guess my issue is, what is it about pole that makes us have to cover up more? Even fully covered people have complained to me that I have too much ass or boobs showing. Pardon my jiggle-vision, perhaps I should wear a burlap potato-sack to hide any indication that I am an adult female?
4.) Family entertainment – Seriously? I never realized the Olympics were specifically designed around that core value. I always thought, you know, it was about athletes competing against each other to be awarded the title of “BEST” at what they do. Pretty sure Wheaties boxes and athletes becoming “heroes” or “role models” came after the part of them being unbelievably, mind-bendingly AWESOME at their sport. I suppose, though, competitors of the original Olympic games did so while completely nude and women were threatened with the death penalty if they so much as attempted to watch (let alone compete). Everything changes for a reason, right?
Idk where I’m really going with this. I’m all for pole being recognized as an actual sport BECAUSE IT IS, but these fruity articles I come across are just too much at times. What is it about pole that brings on so much hate and confusion? It isn’t just the fact that strippers have done it, obviously, as it was undoubtedly aesthetically appealing long before the original poling stripper decided to add the apparatus to her act. I swear, it’s beyond that single perception which brings out such venom and spit at times.
Log in to reply.