[PoleJunkie]

I'm not sure if this is connected, but I see a "trickle down" attitude here. (Please pardon me for the use of an overused political cliche).  The anti-exotic movement thing is happening in the professional realm of pole dance competition, so it would make since the same attitude would flow downward into the studios. There have been many posts discussing the issue of exotic dancers being banned from top competitions.  I completely agree that a business owner can choose to allow or disallow people to compete, however you're willing to accept a dancer's money for classes but not let them perform? The exotic dancer can share a pole with me but not a spot in a competitive lineup? 

I'm insulted.

The person behind the rules is presuming I am not as good as an exotic dancer. When I compete- I want to compete against the best of the best. Don't block me from matching my skills, abilities, and strength against anyone simply based on where they work. If a competition is arranged by skill, that I can understand.  At this point, I gladly admit my bell would be rung by many beautiful talented dancers. Why– because they have more experience! Not because they work at a nightclub. 

Can someone explain to me why the individuals with competition decision making authority want to limit my competition? It only makes American pole dancing weaker.

[PoleJunkie]

have a Kindle Fire with the same issue. I installed Google Chrome and videos will run now. I also downloaded Tubemate. That is letting me play youtube videos. I realize they are different systems, but it might be a possible option.